A hearing highlighted the confusion that still exists among doctors, lawyers and advocates about how to interpret the state's new abortion lawsshe added her name to the growing list of Texas women who have shared stories of being denied medically necessary abortions.
Harrison pushed back, saying her doctors did believe a selective reduction to be the standard of care. Zaafran said repeatedly that they would consider revisiting aspects of the proposal where doctors’ interpretations of the guidance was at odds with the boards’ intent. In addition to gathering all the definitions from different abortion statutes in one place, the guidance primarily lists out what doctors are expected to document when deciding whether to perform an abortion.
“The requirement to determine when there was an adequate time to transfer the patient by any means available is so vague as to be unworkable,” testified Molly Duane, senior staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights. “Physicians need guidance on when they can provide abortions, not more reasons why they shouldn’t.”
Skopp said her fellow doctors’ fears were “irrational,” but called on the medical board to clearly reassure them that they can rely on their reasonable medical judgment to decide when to perform an abortion.
Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SAcurrent - 🏆 607. / 51 Read more »
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »
Source: TexasTribune - 🏆 441. / 53 Read more »