Dal Babu is wrong to suggest that the British Association for Shooting and Conservation should not provide its members with details of fellow members who are doctors and are willing to provide medical verification for a firearms certificate . The shooting community has an obvious interest in ensuring public safety. Without it, responsible and legal shooting as we know it would not exist.
Why should GPs take on this work? It’s nothing to do with them. They have their own work to do. If you want an assessment you can jolly well pay for it
My brother just told the Dr he didn't need MH meds anymore and they signed for a license same appointment. Systems a joke. Tell them you want trans healthcare however and it's gatekeeping all the way.
We don’t buy bitcoin We earn bitcoin From Mining I'm ready to show 10 lucky people on how to earn 0.1 ($4,487) and more daily! No referral No withdrawal fees Interested people only Kindly send us a DM
Reasonable: GPs are not qualified to do the psychological assessment needed to say if a person should own weapons or not.