Supreme Court Rules That Idaho Hospitals Cannot Deny Abortions in Medical Emergencies

  • 📰 TeenVogue
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 4 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 51%

Abortion News

Supreme Court,Reproductive Rights

The Supreme Court found that Idaho’s strict abortion ban does not trump EMTALA, a federal law requiring hospitals to provide stabilizing care — which can include abortions.

This article first appeared in The 19th* The Supreme Court will allow Idaho hospital physicians to provide abortions when they are needed in medical emergencies, the court ruled Thursday, in an opinion that was briefly made public Wednesday and reported by Bloomberg. The writing represents a meaningful — if temporary — victory for health care providers. The court has dismissed the case and returned it to lower courts for further litigation.

Samuel Alito, once of the court’s conservative members, echoed those criticisms in a dissent, arguing that the Supreme Court has all the information it needs already to rule on the relationship between EMTALA and state abortion laws. “That question is as ripe for decision as it ever will be. Apparently, the Court has simply lost the will to decide the easy but emotional and highly politicized question that the case presents. That is regrettable,” he wrote.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 481. in HEALTH

Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines