Chernobyl’s cover-up is a warning for our nuclear future | Kate Brown

  • 📰 The Guardian
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 53%

Health Health Headlines News

Health Health Latest News,Health Health Headlines

Before expanding nuclear power to combat climate change, we need answers to the global health effects of radioactivity, says nuclear historian Kate Brown

In 1986, the Soviet minister of hydrometeorology, Yuri Izrael, had a regrettable decision to make. It was his job to track radioactivity blowing from the smoking Chernobyl reactor in the hours after the 26 April explosion and deal with it. Forty-eight hours after the accident, an assistant handed him a roughly drawn map. On it, an arrow shot north-east from the nuclear power plant, and broadened to become a river of air 10 miles wide that was surging across Belarus toward Russia.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

'clear and deliberate misinformation' by Kate Brown - and

Fearmongers & fake news mass media have induced much more deaths(abortions, heart-attacks, suicides) by spreading irrational fear and by favoring coal/oil/gas/fracking(backup for intermittent renewables) which air pollution respects no border and kills millions of people a year.

Kate Brown 'appears to have an ideological commitment to pre/anti-modernism that motivates her to see radiation not just from nuclear plants but also from medicine...'

Yeah, this sounds a lot like fear mongering over the ONE sustainable alternative source of energy that we have.

Very interesting!

I don't see what this has to do with nuclear power in general. Chernobyl was a cover up not because it was a nuclear power plant, but because it happened in Soviet Russia. You twisting this into anti nuclear propaganda is dishonest at best.

I knew North Wales had been affected by Chernobyl but didn’t realise that post-Chernobyl restrictions on some North Wales farmers had lasted for 26 years !

So instead of improving the techology of nuclear power you propose to completely forget the most powerfull source of energy and start with lo-productive alternative sources that in addition requires huge amount of space to be built on. Right?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 84. in HEALTH

Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines