The Trace and FiveThirtyEight firstlast year that the CDC’s 2016 gun injury estimate was so uncertain the agency classified it as “unstable and potentially unreliable.” Since then, the agency’s data, which in 2017 was derived from a sample of just 60 hospitals, has. The CDC’s gun violence estimates are widely cited in academic articles.
“We as lawmakers, as every American citizen, should be able to follow and understand the latest trends on firearms injuries without the concern of coming across ‘unstable and potentially unreliable’ data,” Menendez told The Trace in an email. Researchers interviewed by The Trace and FiveThirtyEight believe the CDC’s estimates are too flawed to use. Guohua Li, editor-in-chief of the medical journal Injury Epidemiology and director of Columbia University’s Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention, said the estimates could be improved by drawing upon a larger and more reliable source of data, such as another database administered by HHS.
FiveThirtyEight MichaelEMann I am beginning to believe that your hockey stick graph has some universal scientific meaning.
FiveThirtyEight Because it might be people of color shooting
FiveThirtyEight Maybe the folks running the CDC are the same folks running the “RUSSIA!!!” campaign?
FiveThirtyEight Because they were not allowed to study it until 4months ago.
FiveThirtyEight They’ve been denied funding for research.
FiveThirtyEight The Trump Magic touch...
FiveThirtyEight Really? Maybe because they have been stifled by conservatives to keep track of that info.
FiveThirtyEight Funding probably
Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »