Johnson & Johnson is found liable for California woman’s baby-powder-linked cancer

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 27 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 82%

Health Health Headlines News

Health Health Latest News,Health Health Headlines

Johnson & Johnson must pay $29 million to Teresa Leavitt, a dying California woman who blamed asbestos-tainted talc for causing her cancer, jurors found.

Johnson & Johnson still faces more than 13,000 lawsuits claiming its 135-year-old baby powder line caused mesothelioma and ovarian cancer.

Johnson & Johnson must pay $29 million to a dying California woman who blamed asbestos-tainted talc for causing her cancer, the company’s latest loss over its iconic baby powder. Jurors in state court in Oakland on Wednesday held J&J responsible for Teresa Leavitt’s mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure. The panel, which included a lawyer and a state-court judge, also found the world’s largest maker of healthcare products didn’t warn Leavitt that its baby powder was tainted with the carcinogen.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Obama voters on the jury.

So now J&J baby powder is linked to cancer?

In addition to the monetary award, she is fresh and dry.

US_FDA

Unfortunately, many juries base their decisions on emotional appeal rather than on factual evidence.

Numerous leading independent institutions, laboratories, universities and governmental agencies have all concluded that there is no asbestos in J&J talc products.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in HEALTH

Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

California jury orders J&J to pay $29 million in latest talc cancer trialA California jury on Wednesday ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $29 million to a... Tests taken over decades at levels that surpass government and industry standards—have consistently shown that Johnson’s cosmetic talc does not contain asbestos. A slap on the wrist. This is absolute nonsense. Lawyers trying to pad their bank accounts while utilizing unintelligent jurors. Big problem in US.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »