We have decided that inflation at two per cent is a judicious and rational objective for the nation’s economy. There is nothing divine about that two per cent target, and yet, no first minister – federal or provincial – and no political party advocates a higher or lower rate of inflation. We have made a categorical imperative decision to hold inflation at two per cent, granting it the status of a comprehensive public policy target.
We have made a categorical decision to make the rate of inflation our decisive economic policy objective. Why do we not aim for a categorical decision to determine our health care policies? Judging by our categorical decision experience in economic policy, it is evident that we are capable of making categorical policy decisions to serve the long-term well-being of our communities. We can, if we set our minds to it, pursue a categorical decision on health care objectives.
Citizens pay taxes on their earnings, their purchases and their assets. The questions tormenting citizens are not concerned with what government should pay for the family doctor we cannot get, or for the emergency department whose doors are locked. The burning question is a categorical one; it concerns health care standards and objectives. We know who pays in the end.
Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TerraceStandard - 🏆 24. / 68 Read more »