So will James Hardie Industries get a partial refund for not being the only company which caused health issues from asbestos? Surely most recipients would have also been exposed to baby powder one way or the other. Win/Win for lawyers yet again.
WTAF?
After I had my 1st born 16 years ago my midwife actually warned me not to use any J&J products. I also had nurses in the maternity ward advise many of us mothers not to the J&J products that is given to all the mothers there in the hospital. They obviously knew something was off
Yup. That there is a company killer. And deservedly so too I might add.
unionsaustralia unionsnsw Profits before people.....
Well someone is telling lies,how do we find out if its uh or Reuters
The more credo the fewer values J&J The values that guide our behaviour are spelled out in Our Credo. Put simply, Our Credo challenges us to put the needs and well-being of the people we serve first – namely the doctors, nurses and patients, mothers and fathers and babies?
This stuff should never be used anyway
Must read! HealthForAll health HealthyLiving HealthyEating healthandsafety healthandwellness healthylifestyle swasthabharat SDGs UnitedNations GlobalGoals globalhealth GlobalCitizen economy economics business news NewsAlert media climatechange IncredibleIndia
I always laughed when people said private enterprise gets stuff done. I audited big companies for decades and almost always they made money by putting people last and not paying tax grifted
Please clarify... does it STILL have asbestos in the talc?
Criminals!
Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »