THERE is no evidence to suggest those that survive coronavirus have immunity, the World Health Organisation has worryingly stated.
Many tests being developed are pin prick blood tests similar to widely used instant HIV tests and measure for raised levels of the antibodies the body uses to fight the virus. She added: "These antibody tests will be able to measure that level of seroprevalence - that level of antibodies but that does not mean that somebody with antibodies means that they are immune."But she cautioned: "We need to ensure that they are validated so that we know what they say they attempt to measure they are actually measuring.
This stinks of fake news to me!
Absolutely no point wasting money on a vaccine then is there.. think about it.
Lost all trust with the WHO. Worthless entity.
China make some shoddy things but this virus was made to last people Covid_19 ChineseVirus19
WHO=CCP
So the survivor could be infected by twice?
While the news itself is terrible,judged from the mouth of WHO,whom lose all credibility those day. it might be the only saving grace. 🤡
How do their bodies overcome the infection? This WHO!!!!
Of course, I concur with the WHO's statement. The South Korean Centre for Disease Control&Prevention, KCDC did report some cases of reinfection among patients that were treated & medically pronounced as negative, likewise similar scenarios in other climes. A vaccine is the best.
There’s also no evidence to say they won’t 💁🏻♂️ FakeNews
Presumably, no evidence (YET) that they will NOT have immunity! Another non-starter, scaremongering, sensationalist headline! Can’t you even SEE that we’re ON YOU, and know that you have nothing else to print atm?!
I haven't seen them tweet this information yet?
Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »