"As the data emerges around the incubation period, it does seem to be more in the five-to-seven-day period and the 14 days does have a margin for error.
The findings did not reveal how infectious people are before they show symptoms, but preliminary evidence suggests there is a short danger period before people start feeling ill. "If somebody is in their incubation period, that is the window when somebody already infected can walk into the country and not be detected by symptom-based surveillance," Associate Professor Lessler. said.
74Barbara It should be 40 days. That’s what quarantine means...
Lock down now before it gets worse
Oh yeah, what about that person who didn't have symptoms for 28 days Muppets 🤮
Less about symptom development and more about reducing economic impact.
I had to wait 5-6 days to see if my flu wasn’t coronavirus. You can get symptoms before that but the pneumonia symptoms won’t start until 5-6 days later. That’s what one coronavirus researchers said.
Furthermore the chief medical officer also claimed testing was reliable and no more than 15 minutes later a woman in Sydney tested positive on her second or third test
No they do not.
Folks, you think those experts are worth being trusted?
I noticed that all pictures about corona virus news on mainstream Twitter are “Asians with masks”. Compare Europe and Korea or japan we can get the difference. Masks works. Some people will pay for their arrogance.
Cancel the Grand Prix please
The pic is a bit racist, yeah?
But what about the outbreak in the outback with rogue roos relishing rambunctiousness?
nah reckon I will stick with the 14 day scenario
Health Health Latest News, Health Health Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »